Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:40:31 +0000 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
<a06240828c90c64f21760@[10.0.0.34]> |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>
>
>As I understand it, the PROBIT study may well have suffered from
>this as well. If the breastfeeding promotion (however successfully
>or unsuccessfully it was implemented) spread to the control
>population, then you cannot conclude that not breastfeeding is not
>detrimental to health because in fact, you lost your control group.
>Of COURSE you wouldn't see a difference.
>
>Best regards, Susan Burger, MHS, PhD, IBCLC
Interesting post, Susan, and illuminating examples.
However, PROBIT *does* show a difference in health outcomes. Not
breastfeeding *is* detrimental to health, qua PROBIT. Where they
didn't find a difference was in respiratory tract infection.
Heather Welford Neil
NCT bfc, tutor
--
http://www.heatherwelford.co.uk
http://heatherwelford.posterous.com
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome
|
|
|