I have this same luxery and the same outcomes. I count in cal per 100ml and never have come below 65-70 from full breasts and most samples are 90 and up. In Dutch texts 69 or 70 cal/ml is usually put as norm for human milk. Obviously the tests done to calculate that are done in non-average sampls.
Since human milk seems to have a much higher average cal count than stated in most references it seems odd to try and increase it even more with some under-norm  and possibly contaminated substitute.

Warmly,

 Gonneke, IBCLC in PP, LC lecturer in icy cold southeern Netherlands


--- On Wed, 12/1/10, [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [LACTNET] calorie  count of breast milk
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Wednesday, December 1, 2010, 5:03 PM

Since I have the luxury of having a Creamatocrit machine in my office, I am able to analyze milk that mothers either have pumped.  I have, so far, never tested milk at less than 22 calorie per ounce - and some as high as 45! And some of the "hind milk" has been lower than the "foremilk".  These observations as well as data from material presented at Hartmann conferences has made me discount the whole foremilk-hindmilk imbalance theory. 


             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome