LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
stillberatung bremen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Oct 2009 01:06:57 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (112 lines)
dear tina,

i'm also interested in that paper, could you also send it to me please?

thx, nina

2009/10/13 Tina Kimmel <[log in to unmask]>:
> Arly, Some of your questions can be answered by reading about the classic
> ways "attachment security" is measured. The gold standard (flawed though it
> is) is the Strange Situation, eg
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Ainsworth#A_Strange_Situation.
>
> Researchers can choose whatever group of individuals and families they want
> to look at. If breastfeeding was not specified, you know they included
> bottlefeeding families, unfortunately.
>
> I wrote a chapter on "Psychosocial Consequences of Not Breastfeeding" (with
> 50+ references) in my dissertation on breastfeeding policy. I can email it
> to you directly.
>
> I think it's very interesting stuff. You can see there were only a few
> studies (at that time in 2007, at least) which focussed directly on
> breastfeeding and attachment, but they all conclude that there is a positive
> correlation.
>
> A couple of studies also investigated the direction of causality between
> attachment and breastfeeding. They concluded that it goes both ways, ie,
> more attchment-engengering moms choose to breastfeed, but in addition, the
> act of breastfeeding itself causes mothers to be more
> attachment-engendering.
>
> Tina
>
> At 10:11 AM -0700 10,13,2009, Arly wrote:
>>
>> Questions:
>>
>> A) Do the classic attachment studies (such as the one by Lamb cited below)
>> specifically exclude formula feeding families as not normal by definition?
>> Have they conducted separate studies for formula feeding families, for
>> families w/stay at home mothers, stay at home fathers, and for families in
>> which no one gets to stay at home?
>>
>> B) Which behaviors under what circumstances are selected as "attachment
>> behavior measures" when observing a normal breastfeeding family?
>>
>> C) What exactly is meant by "no preference"? In what context?
>>
>> If anyone on Lactnet, or respected by Lactnetters, has addressed these
>> specific questions, I would like to get in contact. I am particularly
>> wondering if anyone has done their graduate research specifically focusing
>> on the differences in attachment between breastfeeding and formula feeding
>> families, with a review of the existing literature.
>>
>> Arly Helm, MS, IBCLC
>> -----------
>> Lamb's landmark longitudinal study* of mother-*infant* and father-*infant*
>> *attachment* was begun in 1974 to try to categorize^ the unique components
>> of father-*infant* *attachment*. Home observations^ of 7-, 8-, 12-, and
>> 13-month-old *infant*s _revealed no preference^ for either parent on
>> *attachment* behavior measures._
>>
>> *[*Lamb ME The development of mother-*infant* and father-*infant*
>> *attachment*s in the second year of life. /Dev Psychol./ 1977; 13:637-648]*
>>
>>            ***********************************************
>>
>> Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
>> To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
>> Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
>> COMMANDS:
>> 1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email:
>> set lactnet nomail
>> 2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
>> 3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
>> 4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet
>> welcome
>
>            ***********************************************
>
> Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
> To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
> Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
> COMMANDS:
> 1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set
> lactnet nomail
> 2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
> 3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
> 4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome
>



-- 
Because the Medieval Church, with the support of kings, princes and
secular authorities, controlled medical education and practice, the
Inquisition constitutes, among other things, an early instance of the
"professional" repudiating the skills and interfering with the rights
of the "nonprofessional" to minister to the poor. -Thomas Szasz, The
Manufacture of Madness-

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2