LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
angie sohler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 29 May 2009 19:48:25 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (89 lines)
Sorry... link still doesn't work.  Here's the article:

(AP)  Joe Six-Pack may have to hand over nearly $2 more for a case of beer 
to help provide health insurance for all. 

Details of the proposed beer tax are described in a Senate Finance Committee 
document distributed to lawmakers before a closed-door meeting Wednesday. 
Senators are focusing on how to pay for expanding health insurance for an 
estimated 50 million uninsured Americans, a cost that could range to some 
$1.5 trillion over 10 years. 

You can't raise that from beer money alone. 

Lawmakers are looking at an extensive list of spending cuts and tax increases, 
including a new levy on the value of job-based health insurance. The latter 
proposal seems to be gaining ground. It could lead to higher income taxes for 
some people with particularly generous job-based health care. 

Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., said no decisions were 
made, but he will use the feedback to shape legislation he intends to introduce 
in the next few weeks. The committee has a critical role to play in the health 
care overhaul, since it writes tax law and oversees the government's giant 
medical insurance programs. Baucus wants to write a bipartisan bill, a goal for 
President Barack Obama. 

"Nothing's pushed off the table," Baucus told reporters after the daylong 
meeting. He said senators have come closer on some issues, but much remains 
to be resolved. 

While many of the revenue raisers involve obscure provisions of federal law, 
most consumers can relate to a beer tax. 

Taxes on wine and hard liquor would also go up. 

And there might be a new tax on soda and other sugary drinks blamed for 
contributing to obesity. A tax of 3 cents per 12-ounce drink would raise about 
$50 billion over 10 years, according to congressional estimates. Diet drinks, 
however, wouldn't be taxed. 

The idea behind the proposed increases is to tax lifestyle choices that 
contribute to rising medical costs. Obesity puts people at risk for diabetes and 
heart problems. Alcohol abuse is a risk factor in several types of cancer, liver 
disease and psychological problems. 

The soft drink industry and beer and wine producers are already lobbying to 
stop the proposals before they gain traction. The tax increases would lead to 
job losses for workers and higher costs for recession weary consumers, say 
the industries. Wine makers are also pointing to studies that suggest a glass a 
day can be good for health. 

"Singling out wine for higher taxes to reform health care is misguided because 
wine is part of a healthy diet and lifestyle for millions of Americans," said 
Robert P. Koch, president of the Wine Institute, which represents California's 
industry. 

Under the proposal lawmakers are considering, beer taxes would be increased 
by 48 cents a six-pack, from the current 33 cents. Beer is still the favorite 
choice of Americans who drink alcohol. 

Wine taxes would rise by 49 cents per bottle, from the current 21 cents. 

And the tax on hard liquor would increase by 40 cents per fifth, from the 
current $2.14. 

Percentage-wise, wine drinkers would take the biggest hit, a 233 percent tax 
increase per bottle. The Wine Institute said the tax increase would be even 
bigger for wines with a higher alcohol content. 

Hard liquor would see the smallest proportional increase, 19 percent per fifth. 

The beer tax would rise by 145 percent per six-pack. 

Proponents of the idea say it would equalize the tax treatment of alcoholic 
drinks, by charging the same tax rate based on alcohol content to all. But that 
would put an end to the current tax advantage enjoyed by beer and wine. 

The higher alcohol taxes would bring in nearly $60 billion over 10 years

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2