Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:51:00 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
It was said:
But when someone else refuses to vaccinate their kids, it puts my children
-- all children -- directly at risk.
I'd like to ask for evidence based research that proves this point beyond a
shadow of a doubt because I seriously doubt it is out there. Case in point
(one of many I personally know about): It was a vaccinated child who
contracted whooping cough (Pertussis) from another vaccinated child that
gave it to my child who was vaccinated as well as to my child who was not
(he was 2.5 months old at the time). Further, if a child is vaccinated
then how are they at risk of contracting some disease that they have been
vaccinated for? Assuming that the vaccinations work as they are supposed to
(which I have seen with my own eyes and children that they don't always)
then the unvaccinated child is a risk to no one.
Proof please.
Respectfully,
Jaye
Jaye Simpson, IBCLC, CIIM
Breastfeeding Network
Sacramento, CA
www.breastfeedingnetwork.net
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome
|
|
|