BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Edwards <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:20:43 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Bob Harrison:

> It is interesting that beekeepers turned in their losses (which in
> Hackenbergs cases was several hundreds of thousands of dollars) and did 
> not
> get help with losses. EVEN IN THE FORM OF LOW COST LOANS!
>
> Many of us feel PPB ( pi-- poor beekeeping) was responsible for a percent 
> of losses and nosema
> ceranae another high percent.

So why should those beekeepers practising 'PPB' get any help from your 
taxpayers?

Surely money going into research provides something of permanent value?
Best wishes

Peter Edwards
beekeepers at stratford-upon-avon.freeserve.co.uk
www.stratford-upon-avon.freeserve.co.uk/

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned 
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2