BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bob Harrison <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:13:14 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
"  In  medical terms this means of "unknown cause ."   More
> accurate, I'd say.

Many of us do not believe CCD exists and all symptoms can be explained by
one of the four possible problems which were put forth by the CCD working
group.

It is interesting that beekeepers turned in their losses (which in
Hackenbergs cases was several hundreds of thousands of dollars) and did not
get help with losses. EVEN IN THE FORM OF LOW COST LOANS!

Many of us feel PPB ( pi-- poor beekeeping) was responsible for a percent of 
losses and nosema
ceranae another high percent.

Because researchers looked and used every piece of modern equipment and 
found nothing new then the problem must have mysteriously disappeared. Wow!

Bob's opinion:
I do not buy the story!

What I did observe was the dollar signs in researchers eyes.

A guess on the amount of money given to U.S. researchers might range up to 
25 million by the time all is said and done. Is this really money spent 
wisely? Glut of bees in California? Best bees in year? Zero money to 
beekeepers who took out serious loans and mortgaged houses to replace the 
bees.



bob

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned 
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2