Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:43:44 -0700 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I agree that a bottle is not a necessary transitional
Dear Friends,
I agree that a bottle is not a necessary transitional item, but nor is a sippy cup. What we teach at our WIC office is to avoid sippy cups as well as bottles. They are essentially the same thing. I am referring to the sippee cup that has a valve to make it no spill. Babies as young as 5 to 6 months old or younger can learn to drink from a regular cup with assistance of course. An older baby or a toddler toting around a sippy cup is just as damaging as if it were a bottle.
Julie Gladney BS, IBCLC, LLLL
Athens, Ohio
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 21:57:44 -0700
From: Marie Farver <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: sippee cup question
Question for you:
For moms who are exclusively BF, not working outside the home, and just
wondering about the occasional night out: for infants who are say, 4 or 5
months old, why not skip the whole bottle scenario and just have them use a
sippee cup? A bottle is not a necessary transitional item, if you know what
I mean; they are going to grow into using a cup as part of maturation,
eventually, so why not just use a sippee cup than "the occasional bottle"?
Thanks for your input -
Marie
******************************************************
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome
|
|
|