Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 3 Jan 2009 14:03:44 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Lee G. wrote:
"their fine can be as high as $40,000? We could
certainly use that in the USA and elsewhere. That would make a lot of
people sit up and take notice that they are violating the civil rights of
children when they interfere with their feeding in public and that there are
serious consequences to such actions."
Unfortuantely, as long as it is exporessed as the mother's right to nurse her infant anywhere they happen to be, I don't think we will get far. We have to concentrate on the BABY's right to eat whenever and wherever the need arises or we will continue to hear comoplaints about "pushy", "extremist", "exhibitionist" women! If it was all about the mom, she could wait or cowtow to other's insensitivities. But babies have no sense of time and when they need, they need now and here, not according to someone else';s wishes.
Winnie Mading IBCLC, LLLL, RN, MOM etc.
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome
|
|
|