LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Sep 2007 20:53:03 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
Jennifer writes:

>  I have to question the wisdom of using the population of Belarus to 
>evaluate the risks of artificial feeding as it pertains to allergies 
>and asthma. Michel Odent has put forth a credible argument that 
>cesarean sections are a significant contributing factor in the 
>sky-rocketing rates of asthma. 75% of the women in Belarus have 
>cesarean sections. According to information I have read, only 10% of 
>women have milk that does not test positive for irradiation 
>(remember Chernobyl) and developing fetuses are at high risk of 
>developing many other diseases,
>


In fact, Kramer cautions against extrapolating the results of the 
study to apply to non-Belarussian contexts, but because allergies are 
so *low* in comparison with the West:

"the incidence of all allergic symptoms was lower in the PROBIT children
than are seen in western industrialised countries but are similar to those 
reported in other E European countries. Therefore the authors urge caution in
extrapolating results in settings where atopic diseases occur more  frequently"

Heather Welford Neil, UK

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
Mail all commands to [log in to unmask]
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or [log in to unmask])
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet or ([log in to unmask])
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2