Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) |
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:28:54 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
No, I mentioned NOT subtracting. You're not supposed to subtract!
Best, Susan
On Jul 12, 2007, at 4:10 PM, Rachel Myr wrote:
> Linda Palmer posted this URL, about the difference between relative
> risk and
> odds ratio. I found it lacked a clear explanation of exactly how
> RR and OR
> are calculated using a four-celled grid, but parts of the
> discussion were
> still edifying. I'm including it again here.
>
> http://www.childrens-mercy.org/stats/journal/oddsratio.asp
>
> This article confirms what I thought, that odds ratios must be
> inverted if
> you want to look at the odds the other way round.
> If you know the odds ratio for two things, and you want people to
> compare
> them in the opposite roles, you invert the odds ratio. You don't
> subtract.
> Thus, if breastfed babies get an illness half as often as formula fed
> babies, you can say that the formula fed babies get the illness
> twice as
> often as the breastfed babies. The ratio one to two, inverted, is
> two to
> one. I am writing this in text because the characters I need to
> set up the
> equation are the ones that typically get garbled on Lactnet.
>
> Susan mentioned subtracting, but I still can't figure out what I would
> subtract from what.
>
> Rachel Myr
> Kristiansand, Norway
>
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
Mail all commands to [log in to unmask]
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or [log in to unmask])
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet or ([log in to unmask])
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
|
|
|