Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 5 Jun 2007 23:02:31 -0700 |
Content-Disposition: |
inline |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Ann and Lisa... thank you so much for addressing this. I must hang my head
in shame and admit that I use similar terminology... I just never gave it a
second thought. I never realized how negative it is to say, "Your milk
isn't in yet". Even though I do discuss how wonderful colostrum is, I can
now see how negative the above statement is and how it can lead a mother to
think (subconsciously or otherwise) that if her milk isn't in, then her
breasts must be empty.
I so appreciate your thoughts on this.
Christina Harris, RN
Seattle, WA
On 6/5/07, Lisa Mandell wrote:
>
> I second Ann Perry who wrote:
>
>
> > Please, please do not tell a mom that her colostrum is not
> breast milk. We
> > need to change that notion.
> >
>
> This is one of my personal pet peeves. I ask moms in the hospital
> postpartum class to raise their hands if they think they don't have
> any milk yet, and they usually all do. I tell them we have done them
> a disservice by labeling the early milk with this funny name,
> "colostrum." It IS milk. It's the first milk, designed to perfectly
> meet baby's early needs. I'd like to get rid of the whole concept of
> colostrum, at least as far as what we teach parents.
>
> Lisa Mandell, MBA, IBCLC
> Havertown, PA USA
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
Mail all commands to [log in to unmask]
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or [log in to unmask])
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet or ([log in to unmask])
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
|
|
|