Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 25 May 2007 10:37:21 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
<010801c79ed4$17378b80$8801a8c0@FranoiseCoudra> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I don't know anything about the chemicals you mentioned, per se, but,
the recommendations even for a smoking mother are that continuing to
breastfeed is still better for the baby than stopping and giving
formula. So, the question would be this - despite the mom's exposure to
those chemicals, would it the baby still be better off getting formula?
From what I've read and understand, it would seem like the baby would
benefit from getting his mother's milk, I wonder if you could get an
opinion from Dr. Jack Newman, do you have his address?
Sincerely,
Liz Cammin, RN, BRAND NEW LLLL, and tandem nursing mama!
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
Mail all commands to [log in to unmask]
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or [log in to unmask])
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet or ([log in to unmask])
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
|
|
|