Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 17 Jan 2007 21:09:58 -0800 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Here is a perspective on risk based approach that I have been thinking about, tell me what you all think.
Even if the risk-based approach is well-done and clear to the class, it is still just a bunch of numbers. I have been experimenting with equating LACK of breastfeeding with other risks that are familiarly looked at as unacceptable. I found this approach effective with healthcare providers and haven't tried it with regular expectant parents.
The two I have come up with so far:
1. Not breastfeeding is approximately same (slightly higher) IQ loss as lead poisoning.
2. Not breastfeeding causes increased childhood cancer risk approximately the same as second-hand smoke exposure increases cancer risk.
Childhood cancer references
Lymphoma (Mather, 1993 and Davis, 1998)
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia (Shu, 1999)
Davis, M.K. Infant Feeding and Childhood Cancer. "Lancet 1988
Karen Seroussi, LLLL, IBCLC, MS-2
Des Moines, IA
---------------------------------
Be a PS3 game guru.
Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET email list is powered by LISTSERV (R).
There is only one LISTSERV. To learn more, visit:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|