Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 30 Jun 2007 12:07:26 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
From this one study -- it looks as though nutrition is more of a factor
than immune protection in very small babies who are intended for the
level of nutrition provided by placenta. Maternal nutrition is likely a
factor here? Other comments?
"Neonatal nutrition and later outcomes of very low birth weight infants
at Kenyatta national hospital."
"Background: Extensive research in developed countries has established
that very low birth weight (VLBW) infants are particularly vulnerable to
the effects of early nutritional deficiencies. There is, however, little
information from poor countries on the long-term effects of these
deficiencies in such infants. Objective: Determine the association
between neonatal feeding regimens and post-discharge morbidity/
mortality and neurological abnormalities at the age of two years for a
cohort of VLBW infants. Design: Prospective Cohort. Methods: One
hundred and seventy five VLBW infants were recruited over a
consecutive period of one year and followed up to the age of two years
corrected for gestation. With neonatal feeding regimes as the exposure
variable, post-discharge re-hospitalization, mortality and Saigal and
Rosenbaum's functional disability assessment scores were compared as
the outcome variables. Results: The 175 infants recruited into the study
had median birth weight of 1400 +/- 103 grams and gestation 32 +/-
2.3 weeks. The male:female ratio was 2:3 while 64 (36.6%) had been
born intrauterine growth retarded. During the newborn period, 83
(47.4%), 35 (20.0%) and 57 (32.6%) of the infants fed on exclusive
breast milk, pre-term formula and mixed preparations respectively. The
median neonatal weight gain was 17 +/- 2.5, 15 +/- 2.0 and 13 +/- 3.9
grams/kilo/day for preterm formula, combined and exclusive breast milk
fed infants respectively. More of the infants fed on breast milk alone
were re-hospitalized compared to those on pre-term formula, RR 2.3;
95%CI 1.4-3.6 or mixed milk preparations, RR 1.9; 95% CI 1.4-2.7.
Infants exclusively fed on breast milk had more neurological disabilities
than those on pre-term formula alone, RR 3.2; 95% CI 1.2-8.1. Though
only 22.9% of pre-term milk fed infants died compared to 36.1% of
those on breast milk alone the difference was not statistically
significant, P>0.05. Conclusion: Nutritionally enhanced enteral feeds
during the first month of life appear to have reduced post-discharge
morbidity and improved neurological outcomes at two years in VLBW
infants."
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
Mail all commands to [log in to unmask]
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or [log in to unmask])
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet or ([log in to unmask])
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
|
|
|