"It's almost as if the burden of proof is on the defendant to prove that
there was an indication for the delivery and it was done correctly,"


Am I the only one who marvels at this statement.  Is this lawyer suggesting
that OBGYNs should be able to intervene as and when they feel like it, with
no accountability to anyone?  Sounds to me like the burden of proof lies
squarely where it should - on the professional who is trained to weigh risks
and proceed accordingly. Primum non nocere

Nina Berry BA/Bed(Hons) Dip Arts(Phil)
Breastfeeding Counsellor
PhD Candidate - "Ethical Issues in the marketing of 'Toddler Milks'"

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
Mail all commands to [log in to unmask]
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or [log in to unmask])
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet or ([log in to unmask])
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]