Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:29:12 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> Janice notes this loophole in Texas breastfeeding law
> >
> >"Under Texas Law, breastfeeding in public is legal," Watson said. "But on
> >private property, people can assert their own standards or moral conduct.
> If
> >people are offended and complained to the management, the management can
> ask
> >someone to leave."
>
> I think the key to closing this hole would be to point out that
> breastfeeding is a matter of
> identity, not "conduct." Physiologically normal babies breastfeed, and
> need to do so
> often. It is central to their identity. Excluding a breastfed baby for
> breastfeeding seems
> pretty similar to excluding an Asian person for being Asian, or a woman
> for being female.
I think that most people would feel that breastfeeding is more akin to a
religious garment. They would feel that while a breastfeeding baby might
prefer to be breastfed that s/hr could, if circumstances required it, be fed
in other ways - the way New York City attempted to require their subway
drivers to remove turbans.
I don't remember what the outcome was in NYC and I don't know what type of
protection would be afforded in privately owned accommodations in Texas.
That being said I am not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV.
Jessica Mattingly M.Ed, CCE, LLLL, IBCLC
Kansas City, MO
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET email list is powered by LISTSERV (R).
There is only one LISTSERV. To learn more, visit:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|