Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 16 May 2006 11:46:45 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="windows-1252" |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Okay so this is going to sound so naive however I am going to ask the
questions anyways for fear of being run out of town! Our scales are so
expensive and supposedly are the best for accuracy, etc. However, I spent
many years working with animals (my ranch and professionally) and we used
to use very good animal digital scales to see how much a lamb or piglet had
taken quite often. They lose so much when givena bottle as it is so un-
natural for them for the first couple feeds at least (hmmm kind of like the
babies i work with now), it can be very important. So, the question is,
these nice scales are in the 50-200 dollar range, do we have any proof that
these are less efficient? they are as reliable for small animals in our
babies range, so why not??? anyone tried this, or do this that wants to
admit it? thought i would ask...
Emily Lindsey, BSPsy, CLE
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|