Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 5 May 2006 22:12:14 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Kathy Eng wrote:
"I for one sent in my survey saying make it harder not easier.
At most of the hospitals near me, the "LCs" are not IBCLC. Or even
close
to becoming one. The market for IBCLCs seems to be shrinking here and
it
is very difficult to make a living doing private practice (some of this
comes from the poorly skilled competition who can not solve mother's
problems and some comes from mothers and physicians not caring about
BF.)
Like to know what others think, although I think this is a done deal."
I also sent my survey in opposition. It's odd, but I don't know anyone
who says they supported the idea of a softer credential, and yet here
it is (is this like the politican who no one claims to have voted for,
but is clearly elected anyway or were the surveys dismissed?). This is
just my personal feeling, but I considered not recertifying at all, b/c
the credential seems to be so insignificant in so many venues (and I
think it is absurd to retake an entry-level test, but that is another
rant). In light of the lack of respect we already face on so many
fronts, I would think action that shores up the IBCLC credential rather
than dilutes it would be much less short-sighted. A softer, diluted
credential just validates what is already going on in the field and
muddies the waters even more. Mothers already hesitate to pay for an LC
and rarely know the difference between an IBCLC and any other
"certification", and they often usually have no idea what the
credential is of the "LC" they have seen. I am very, very disappointed.
Jennifer Tow, IBCLC, CT, USA
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|