Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 4 Aug 2005 21:38:56 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I think that in the overall picture children sleeping alone in a own bed and separated room will tend to have a higher SIDS ratio than the same group on their backs. But, this is because sleeping on their tummies does make babies sleep deeper and too deep a sleep is the risk factor. If a child already has a good deep sleep on it's back, sleeping deeper on his tummy may be just too much. On the other hand, if a baby does not or hardly sleep on his back, sleeping on his tummy will just get him a bit of sleep.
Warmly,
Gonneke,
Dutch IBCLC, living in Germany, teaching in Belgium
(``''**~**''``}:{``''**~**''``)
"Jennifer Stevens, RN" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
I don't quite think that rises to the level of not using a carseat. Some
babies do not sleep well on their backs, and sleep is important for the baby
also, is it not? My second child slept on his tummy after 3 weeks of not sleeping
well on his back. I found out later that he had reflux. I felt quite
confident that he was safe sleeping on his tummy beside me in his cosleeper. He was
on a firm surface and with no pillows, quilts, etc. Hands up all who let
their child sleep in his position of comfort.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|