Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:51:04 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Teresa writes:
<<She offered to pump her breasts first if they
were concerned about him getting too much milk, but they said that was no
good either - the research supported babies getting pacifiers, not being at
the breast.>>
That's because the research was done on babies who were in the NICU whose
mothers were not there 24/7. Its like trying to prove a negative. The point
is, what is the POINT of the pacifier. What does it do? Why is it important
for premies? The breast in this case does exactly the same thing (only
more). Where is the documentation that breastfeeding is tiring? Perhaps working
and working to get a baby to latch on can be tiring, but not the physical
act of breastfeeding/suckling at the breast. If I hear that one more time,
I'll.....I'll.....I'll.... -- geeze, I don't know what I'll do, but it really
frosts my gizzard.
Snarl.
Jan Barger, RN, MA, IBCLC -- Wheaton, IL
_Lactation Education Consultants_
(http://www.lactationeducationconsultants.com/)
_My Mother of the Bride Blog_ (http://www.motherofbridebyjan.blogspot.com/)
_Torrey's Wedding Webpage_
(http://weddings.theknot.com/pwp/view/co_main.aspx?coupleid=3216252686617334)
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|