Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:13:48 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
When my grandson (now three) was born prematurely, my daughter-in-law was
strongly urged by the nurses to have him use a pacifier. She was there 24
hours a day with him (slept in a room attached to the nursery) and doing
kangaroo care as much as they would allow. He was being gavage-fed expressed
breastmilk and she held him close to her breast for all feedings. She
suggested that instead of a pacifier, she could put him to the breast - but
they said no, that would be too tiring for him. Why is a pacifier helpful
but the breast too tiring? She offered to pump her breasts first if they
were concerned about him getting too much milk, but they said that was no
good either - the research supported babies getting pacifiers, not being at
the breast.
This makes no sense to me.
Teresa Pitman
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|