LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nikki Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 11 May 2005 07:23:02 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
 
 
In a message dated 5/11/2005 12:08:04 AM Eastern Daylight Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

Both of the  supplemented formulas were linked to better developmental
outcomes than the  unsupplemented formula, Dr. Deborah A. Diersen-Schade,
from Mead Johnson  Nutritionals in Evansville, Indiana, and  colleagues
report.


Dear Colleagues:
    How interesting that the company found its product  was best. What a 
surprise. And now I will extract my tongue from the hole in my  cheek!
    This finding is opposite to Makrides, and the  Cochrane Data Base which 
found that supplemented formulae weren't any better for  premies or for term 
babies than the old  standards............................and no formulae were 
as good as  human milk.
    warmly,

Nikki Lee RN, MS, Mother of 2, IBCLC, CCE
Maternal-Child Adjunct  Faculty Union Institute and University
Film Reviews Editor, Journal of Human  Lactation
Support the WHO Code and the Mother-Friendly Childbirth  Initiative

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2