This is the scariest article I have ever read. I swear, I am about ready to
hang up the uterus and not have any more babies...even with a midwife. Not
only that, do I keep fighting as a doula and breastfeeding advocate or is it
hopeless???
Having a rough day after a long day with a client who ended up with a
c-section....
Micky

MANAGED CARE January 2003. ©MediMedia USA
Not long ago, managed care plans sought to reduce the rate of C-section
births in the U.S. Now, C-sections are going up -- and plans are going along.
Changing Medical Evidence Brings Shift in C-Section Stance

By Bob Carlson

If you wake up to ABC's Good Morning America, you may remember a recent
story featuring UCLA urologist Jennifer Berman, MD, a frequent contributor
on the "Healthy Woman" segment. This time, Berman herself was the subject.

"Dr. Jennifer Berman has a request that strikes at the heart of a
controversy," Diane Sawyer explained as video footage showed Berman's
five-month prenatal visit to her Ob/Gyn. "What she's about to ask for is an
elective C-section. She wants to have her baby surgically, and she's doing
it, she says, because of her first childbirth experience and because the
problems she sees in her patients after they have vaginal births."

This is a story we're likely to encounter more often. Elective C-sections
(also called C-section on demand) are, in part, behind the skyrocketing
Cesarean-section birth rate in the United States. This comes after a decade
of emphasis on suppressing unnecessary C-section births, a school of medical
thinking that the managed care industry wholeheartedly supported.

According to "Births: Preliminary Data for 2001," by the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, nearly a quarter of all births (24.4 percent) were
delivered by C-section, up from 22.9 percent in 2000. After a steady decline
in Cesarean deliveries from 1989 to 1996, there has been a 17-percent
increase over five years.

Evolving standards of care have played a part. A decade ago, breech babies
were delivered vaginally, but recent studies endorsed by the American
College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommend that all breech
babies now be delivered by C-section.

Elective inductions, which currently account for about 19 percent of births
in the United States, also contribute to the higher rate.

The last dip in C-section rates occurred in the late 1980s and early 1990s,
when vaginal birth after C-section (VBAC) was thought to be preferable to
another C-section. But several years of data from VBAC trials of labor
revealed substantially higher rates of fetal death due to uterine rupture.
Administering oxytocin or prostaglandin gel to induce labor increased the
risk even more. ACOG now discourages the use of prostaglandin gel, and
Ob/Gyns have dusted off the venerable adage of "once a Cesarean, always a
Cesarean."

An ACOG initiative to make sure that C-sections could be performed promptly
on VBAC patients also contributed to substantially higher C-section rates.
The so-called "immediate availability rule" meant that a surgeon and an
anesthesiologist had to be in attendance whenever a woman was allowed a VBAC
trial of labor. Many smaller hospitals couldn't afford this and got out of
the VBAC business, opting instead for more predictable -- and statistically
safer -- repeat C-sections.

"The net effect was to dramatically reduce the number of women who were
undergoing VBAC trials of labor," says Charles Lockwood, MD, Anita O'Keefe
Young Professor and chairman of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
at Yale University School of Medicine. "Without a doubt, that is the primary
impetus for the resurgence of Cesarean sections."

Lockwood's explanation appears to be consistent with CDC data, which show
that VBACs declined 20 percent from 2000 to 2001 and have fallen 72 percent
since 1996.
Malpractice effects

But this retreat doesn't account for the simultaneous jump in primary
C-sections, and Lockwood, the immediate past chairman of ACOG's committee on
Ob/Gyn practice, allows that the growing malpractice crisis also played a
role. C-sections have become the de facto standard of care for Ob/Gyns
already hammered by wildly escalating malpractice premiums and by carriers
who have pulled out of some markets altogether.

"I'm not convinced, but the perception is that doing a C-section will reduce
your liability risk. It's true, nobody can argue that you should have done a
C-section sooner if you did one from the get-go," says Bruce Flamm, MD, an
Ob/Gyn at Kaiser Permanente in Riverside, Calif., and an early proponent of
VBAC.

Like many, and probably most, Ob/Gyns, Flamm and Lockwood regard C-sections
as major surgery with quantifiable risks and that they should be done only
if medically indicated. At the same time, they acknowledge that patient
choice may become the decisive factor. That scenario gained credibility in
2001 when then- ACOG president Benson Harer, MD, advocated on-demand
Cesareans in his organization's newsletter.

Speaking for himself and not for ACOG, Harer argued that Cesarean delivery
is less traumatic for baby and mother. This position had already been
advanced by David Walters, MD, in his 1999 book, Just Take It Out: The
Ethics and Economics of Cesarean Section and Hysterectomy.

"My belief is that Cesarean birth is fundamentally superior for mothers and
babies," says Walters, an Ob/Gyn in Mount Vernon, Ill. "The maternal
mortality rate in the United States would go down and so would long-term
morbidity in terms of injury to the pelvic floor, specifically bladder
prolapse, stressed urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, and uterine
prolapse -- for all of which, vaginal birth is the number one risk factor."

Many Ob/Gyns and vaginal-birth supporters aren't persuaded that vaginal
delivery causes pelvic floor dysfunction, but as C-sections become more
routine, more women like Berman may decide to play it safe.

Flamm expects to see an all-time high rate of Cesarean sections in the
United States for 2002. Lockwood can conceive of a 50-percent rate within 10
years, but believes that natural birth eventually will come back into favor.
Walters predicts that all American births will be via C-section within 20
years, not necessarily because that's what women will demand, but because of
the prohibitive malpractice liability associated with vaginal delivery.

"The Association of Trial Lawyers of America has put vaginal birth out of
business, but nobody's actually reporting it yet," says Walters.
Managed care goes along

C-sections come with a higher price tag than vaginal births -- about 50
percent higher, though the actual cost of a C-section varies by region and
depends on whether complications are present -- which raises questions about
cost and resource consumption. But managed care plans -- following their
mantra of evidence-based practice -- aren't digging in on this issue, where
once they did. "Health plans have traditionally deferred to a physician's
recommendation," says Mohit Ghose, speaking for the American Association of
Health Plans. "That's where we have been and that's where we're going to
continue to be."

Often, plans seeking guidance on controversial practices look toward
National Committee for Quality Assurance standards. But while NCQA tracks
C-section rates, it never has included a Cesarean-related performance
measure in HEDIS.

"The problem with the C-section rate is there is no clear and convincing
evidence that says that 24 percent is better than 30 percent is better than
20 percent," explains NCQA Executive Vice President Gregory Pawlson, MD,
MPH. "The best experts in the field can't decide, and without that, you can
report the rate, but you can't turn it into a measure of quality."

Consumers are forging ahead with their own ideas about quality.

"I don't think a doctor should tell us how to have a baby," said Berman at
the end of her "Healthy Woman" segment on GMA. "We're able to choose whether
we want laparoscopic surgery or open surgery, whether we want a boob job or
a tummy tuck. Why can't we choose this?"

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html