Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:26:51 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thanks for the page number in the WHO Global Strategy. I was surprised by
this document, actually: it says, "for those few health situations where
infants cannot, or should not, be breastfed, the choice of the best
alternative -- expressed breast milk from an infant's own mother, breast milk
from a healthy wet-nurse or a human-milk bank, or a breast-milk substitute
fed with a cup, which is a safer method than a feeding bottle and teat --
depends on individual circumstances."
You can find it here:
http://www.who.int/nut/documents/gs_infant_feeding_text_eng.pdf
While the options are presented in the same order we've all heard, there's no
clear indication that this represents any preference among them.
I wrote to Denise Fisher, who uses the "fourth choice" information in her
thoroughly referenced BreastEd courses, and Cynthia Good Mojab, who asked the
question I found in the archives. They both wrote back promptly (thank you!)
and steered me here:
http://www.unicef.org/ffl/pdf/factsforlife-en-part5.pdf (see page 11), or for
a one-page version of the relevant section look here:
http://www.unicef.org/ffl/04/6.htm
So now that I have a reference I will send off my letter to the NY Times and
see what happens.
Jamie
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|