LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Judy Ritchie <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 2 Jun 2004 14:04:24 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (85 lines)
Regarding the stalled Ad Council Breastfeeding Campaign.
Judy Ritchie 

Please forward!
 
On Friday night at 10 pm Eastern Time, ABC 20/20 is expected to do a segment
on the controversies surrounding the National Breastfeeding Awareness
Campaign.  They've apparently taken a very aggressive approach and the
results should be of great interest to anyone supportive of breastfeeding. 
As is always the case with the media, there is a possibility that the
segment will be pulled at the last moment.
"What Controversy?" some of you might be asking. The article below appeared
in the last issue of Breastfeeding Matters (Volume 6, No. 1, March 2004),
the newsletter of the Breastfeeding Coalition of Washington.
 
 
After much controversy and debate leading to delays during the fall of 2003,
it was announced at the United States Breastfeeding Committee (USBC) meeting
in January that the US Breastfeeding Awareness Campaign would be launched in
the spring. 
 
As previously reported in Breastfeeding Matters (Vol. 6, No. 1, Spring 2003)
the Advertising Council and the government’s Office of Women’s Health (OWH)
was scheduled to launch a three year National Breastfeeding Media Campaign.
This creative and well-researched campaign was scheduled to start during
World Breastfeeding Week (August 1-7, 2003) and was pushed back to December.
The December launch date was scrapped after representatives from two major
formula companies complained about the campaign to two members of the
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Executive Committee. Soon thereafter,
Dr. Carden Johnston, the newly appointed President of the AAP, wrote a
letter to Tommy Thompson (Secretary of Health & Human Services) asking that
the campaign’s emphasis be changed to reflect the positive effects of
breastfeeding rather than the risks of not breastfeeding.  The campaign
focused on the "risks associated with not breastfeeding" and included
statistics from studies that have found that babies fed formula have a
higher risk of developing asthma, diabetes, leukemia and other illnesses.
The messages contained in the campaign were designed based on 36 focus
groups that were conducted around the country. Information gathered from the
focus groups indicated that it was essential that the health consequences of
not breastfeeding be clearly communicated in the campaign.  
 
The formula companies were worried that the campaign would "give the
impression that infant formula is unhealthy and potentially dangerous."  
This "benefits" type of campaign does a disservice to public health by
framing infant feeding as a life style choice, rather than a health issue.
As Amy Spangler, Chair of the US Breastfeeding Committee explains, “We do
not, for example, persuade people to wear seatbelts by saying they are "even
safer" than wearing no seatbelt, or that using a car seat is "even safer"
than holding an infant on one's lap, or that quitting smoking is "even
healthier" than not smoking. Nor is there any concern about inducing guilt
in people who smoke, or don't wear seatbelts or use car seats.”
 
At this point in time, the risk-focused strategy remains but the relative
risk statements and the references to leukemia and diabetes have been
removed. One of the strongest points in the campaign is that the ads will
feature the importance of exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months. This is
fully supported and backed by HHS and NIH. While the ads targeting childhood
diabetes and leukemia have been removed, HHS has committed to further study
of the risk relationships between these diseases and not breastfeeding. The
theme of the campaign was also confirmed at the USBC meeting: Babies Were
Born to be Breastfed!

Kimberly Radtke, Program Coordinator 
Breastfeeding Coalition of Washington 
11000 Lake City Way NE, Suite 301 
Seattle, WA 98125 
206.281.8032 (p) 
206.270.8891 (f) 
www.hmhbwa.org
Promoting, protecting and supporting breastfeeding as a vital part of the
health and development of children and their families.
 

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2