Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Nov 2004 22:36:08 -0700 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
<001901c4c73e$f1ae2c80$91e1ef04@D7006R21> |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
All I can say vis a vis this case is that the owner is claiming right
to refuse service. He said so on the news clip and in the newspaper
article I read.
And while they may not "legally" be allowed to refuse service, they can
come up with another reason certainly, as I have seen here in Utah too
many times to count in the last few months, to refuse service to
someone "undesirable." I would think someone (ie, the mother) would
have to press charges in order to have it enforced one way or the other.
They had a nurse-in, from what I understand, and were ALL refused
service.
Very bizarre.
Katie
On Wednesday, November 10, 2004, at 09:04 AM, mvance12 wrote:
> Texas law looks clear that a mother has a right to breastfeed. I am not
> familiar with Texas' law the allows restaurants to refuse service, but
> it
> would seem that it would not trump the right to breastfeed. Refusal of
> service is usually for drunkeness, too many people in the party, etc.
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|