Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 27 Oct 2003 09:43:28 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> "the California Supreme Court ruled that he had no entitlement to any =
> rights to his own cells after they had been removed
> from his body."
I must say I,too, find this rather disturbing and disrespectful.
In Jewish tradition, when one has lost a body part through amputation
or some other say, it is buried and when the person dies, he or she
is buried with it. I do not know if this is true of organs as well.
While the laws were orginally written before that was an issue,
I have no doubt that contemprary legal scholars have addressed the
issue.
Very different worldviews.
Naomi Bar-Yam
--------------------------------
Naomi Bar-Yam Ph.D.
[log in to unmask]
Researcher, Writer, Educator
in Maternal and Child Health
--------------------------------
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|