Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 24 Sep 2003 22:29:03 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
About PBDEs, I don't know, but with contaminants such as PCBs, yes,
breastfed infants can have higher levels b/c of breastmilk exposures.
There was a study, however, that indicated that the formula fed babies
fared worse than the breastfed ones even given that the formula fed
babies' levels of PCBs were lower (more ear infections, etc.). In other
words, breastmilk may have helped ameliorate the prenatal exposure to
PCBs that both sets of infants had had.
I am looking for more studies that would confirm this, if anyone can
lead me to any.
Christine Gross-Loh
>
>
> Another study could use a similarly large sample to compare levels of
> toxin
> (s) among breastfed and artificially-fed infants. The query would be,
> "Do
> breastfed infants have higher levels of 'named toxin' than
> artificially-fed
> infants?" My hypothesis would be that breastfed infants do not have
> higher
> levels of toxins that artificially-fed infants, but we will not know
> that
> until solid research tells us that.
>
> Have there been any such studies?
>
> Debra Swank, RN BSN IBCLC
> Winchester, Virginia USA
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|