Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 3 Dec 2003 10:23:54 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The Disney "article" seems to me one of those that is not even worthy
of a response. Our energy is better spent in places where there is more
hope of making an impact.
However, the fact that there is a link to a page on the FDA (Food and
Drug Administration, a US government agency) website that is called,
"Infant Formula: Second Best but Good Enough," has me very concerned.
That article is the usual stuff about formula being close to breast
milk but not quite, no references. Clearly from the "let's not make Mom
feel too guilty" school of web pages.
I want FDA to feel guilty for putting out such "information."
Here's the URL:
http://www.fda.gov/fdac/features/596_baby.html
Naomi Bar-Yam
--------------------------------
Naomi Bar-Yam Ph.D.
[log in to unmask]
Researcher, Writer, Educator
in Maternal and Child Health
--------------------------------
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|