Thought some of the quoted references and comments might interest
Lactnet subscribers
as to how the female body protects newborns.
Judy Ritchie

From: Paul Connett [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 4:44 AM
INTERNATIONAL FLUORIDE INFORMATION NETWORK
IFIN BULLETIN: IFIN # 846: Public Health warning #1.
September 15, 2003.

Dear All,

This is the first in a series of 14 bulletins in which I will be
focusing on public health warnings on fluoridation which are being
ignored by public health officials as well as many non-governmental
organizations otherwise engaged in protecting the public health.

1. The very low level of fluoride in mothers' milk.

For our first public health warning, we start at the beginning: baby's
first meal.

According to the Institute of Medicine (I0M, 1997, page 292), "The
fluoride concentration in human milk ranges from 0.007 to 0.011 mg/liter
(Ekstrand et al., 1984; Esala et al. 1982; Spak et al., 1982)." In other
words the level of the fluoride ion in mothers' milk is approximately
0.01 ppm, which is 100 times lower than that added to the public water
supply where water fluoridation is practiced. This means that a baby,
which is bottle fed with milk formula made up with fluoridated tap water
will be getting 100 times more fluoride than nature had intended.

As far as the practice of water fluoridation is concerned we should be
concerned about this on two fronts. First of all this very low natural
level of fluoride in mothers' milk is telling us that fluoride is not
necessary for healthy teeth, healthy bones or healthy anything else.
Mothers' milk has been designed by nature over a huge period of time to
present to the baby the ideal mixture of nutrients for early growth. As
apologists for fluoridation are swift to point out the fluoride ion is
readily available in nature -indeed it is the 13th most abundant element
in the earth's crust, so it is not through any lack of availability
which causes it to be so low in mothers' milk. Indeed, life evolved from
the sea which has an average concentration of fluoride ion of about 1.3
ppm. This low level further underlines the fact that no evidence has
been presented to persuade the scientific community that fluoride is a
nutrient. In particular, no disease has ever been shown to be caused by
lack of fluoride.

Some apologists for fluoridation, like a spokesperson for the Victorian
Department of Heath in Australia, have claimed that mothers' milk does
not guarantee an ideal nutritional mix for the baby. They give as
evidence for this the fact that in some instances mothers' milk is low
in folic acid leading to avoidable damage to the baby. However, this is
not a good example because folic acid cannot be made in the body and if
it is low in mothers' milk it simply reflects the fact that the mother's
diet is low in this substance. There are other examples we could sight
where a mother on a poor diet, will provide a poorer quality milk to her
baby. However, in the case of fluoride, a mother on a healthy diet, with
an abundant supply of fluoride, will not pass more than a miniscule
amount of this on to her baby in her milk. There is a concern where a
mother is getting excess fluoride in her diet about her passing fluoride
onto her baby during fetal growth because fluoride can cross the
placental membrane. In China they have found excess levels of fluoride
in the bones and the brains of aborted fetuses.

Dr. Vyvyan Howard, an infant and fetal pathologist from the University
of Liverpool in the UK puts the situation this way:

"Nature appears to have evolved a mechanism of minimizing the exposure
of infants to fluoride. Human breast milk only contains between 5 and 10
parts per billion of fluoride, while adult blood contains between 59 and
640
parts per billion. However chloride, a closely associated halogen ion
that is
essential for life, is present in breast milk at 360,000 parts per
billion.
There must be an evolutionary selection pressure operating for this
selective exclusion of an otherwise highly diffusible anion."

The second reason for concern is the notion that fluoride is so low in
mothers' milk because nature was aware of fluoride's extremely high
biological activity and therefore had good reasons for keeping it away
from the baby's developing tissues. We now know that fluoride can
inhibit many enzymes; can interfere with the normal fucntioning of
several metal ions like calcium and magnesium, and in the presence of a
trace amount of aluminum can switch on G-proteins, thereby interfering
with the messaging system of many important messengers such as water
soluble hormones, growth factors and neurotransmitters.

In 1978, Dr. Arvid Carlsson (Nobel laureate in Medicine in 2000) offered
as one of his key reasons for opposing fluoridation in Sweden, were the
concerns he had about the extra exposure to the developing brain cells
of a new born baby bottle fed with formula made up with fluoridated tap
water.

This concern appears prophetic now that evidence from China indicates
that children's IQ appears to be lowered by water containing as little
as 1.8 ppm fluoride (see Public Health warning #9, to come).

Paul Connett.

PS I would welcome readers comments about this Public Health Warning and
any of the other 13 warnings to come in future bulletins.

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html