Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 4 Dec 2002 08:49:15 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>
>
>The digital aspect of the newer scales can also be misleading -- people
>assume that since they are capable of reporting a weight to within 5 grams
>(or even a gram), that they must be both accurate and precise within plus or
>minus 5 grams, but I don't believe this is necessarily so.
>
Yes, this was in fact a digital scale Barb. :-)
I take this to mean that we can't be sure of any weight, though I figure
it ought to be precice enough to give a general ballpark figure. Nyssa
was weighed (only once) at birth and came in at 7 lbs 1 oz (3200
g.)...although the student midwife wrote down 3700 g. (8 lbs 1 oz or so)
as a mistake and for a week or so they were arguing over whether she had
lost any birthweight or not (she didn't, though a weight of 3500 g. [7
lbs 9 oz or so] on day 5 would have been a loss had she weighed 3700 g.
at birth). So, I think I can safely assume she has gained a bit over 2
pounds or so. :-) Somewhere in there... I know my own midwife who did
the weighing did say 7 lbs 1 oz and wrote it down along with 3200 g. in
her booklet...but other official papers filled in by her student said
3700 g. I specifically remember, even through my hazy afterpains state,
listening and hearing 3200/7-1 from the midwife...and she was not near
big enough to be an 8 lbs baby.
Fio
(with a new webpage up and photos of Nyssa:
http://www.geocities.com/macbump/nyssa.htm )
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|