Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 1 Oct 2002 16:06:43 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jenny South asks for thoughts on the reproductive endocrinologist's comments
to her patient. Here are mine:
I think it sounds like this doc has a working knowledge of BF endocrinology.
It is entirely plausible that breastfeeding played a role, by this line of
reasoning.
Presented in this context it looks a lot less like sacrificing BF on the
altar of ignorance. We don't need to know whether Jenny's patient's periods
were normal or delayed, light, or absent, as long as Jenny and her patient
know it.
If this were my doctor I would be inclined to keep going back.
from Jenny's post:
"Breast feeding does alter your hormones. Tubal motility is affected by
alterations in hormonal status---if your periods are delayed, lite, or
absent than most certainly your hormonal status is affected by your breast
feeding...if they are entirely normal menstrual cycles then the effect of
breast feeding is likely nominal."
Rachel Myr
Kristiansand, Norway
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|