Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 6 Sep 2002 11:25:11 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The fact that there was no height or skull growth makes me immediately
suspicious about endocrine problems. I have to assume that the ped/family
practitioner involved ordered x-rays and blood work in preparation for a
referral to endocrinologist. The slight developmental issues fit with the
hypopituitarism differential diagnosis, as do the early feeding challenges.
If babies generally double birth weight by 6 months and triple it by one
year, this babe should be within striking range of 21 lbs and, more
importantly in this case, growing taller and "bigger headed". I just checked
a site on the web for info about the hypopituitarism that will be of
interest to you. Good nutrition is obviously of importance but the numbers
indicate a much more involved issue than a case of too few calories. Here's
the site: www.mc.vanderbilt.edu/peds/pidl/endocr/grohorm.htm.
Bonny Cannell Nothern, RN, MSN, NP, IBCLC
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|