LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Lown, Ann" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 6 Jun 2002 16:46:36 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Oops, did it again! Been off a long time. Would ask readers: what do you
think is the best/most useful/most enlightening way to define amounts of
breastfeeding, for survey to monitor mothers'  feeding practices? Would you
go for exclusive/partial/none or full/partial/none (if so, how would you
define "full"?). How would you define the high, medium and low subcategories
of "partial"? I've seen ">80/20-80/<20" and "more than half/about half/ less
than half" as two definitions of "high/medium/low". What do you think?
Thanks.
(Apologize if this topic has been discussed in detail lately, but I don't
find anything specific in the archives.)
Ann Lown, St. Vincent Hospital, Santa Fe, NM

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2