Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 27 Mar 2002 06:19:43 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I love Pamela Morrison, Barbara Wilson-Clay, Natalie Rawlings Kraut, and
Rachel Myr’s recent comments on this thread.
Pamela wrote:
< we might not automatically need to blame the hospital practices and
policies in the North/West for all that goes wrong with breastfeeding.>
Does anyone else remember the report that Mike Woolridge made about one of
his studies in rural Thailand? Because it was the hospital routine to
separate mothers and babies for many hours after birth, his group went to
some trouble to arrange a study in which the experimental group was assisted
to begin breastfeeding “early,” which I think was within four hours of
birth. Lo and behold, when they followed up with moms and babies from both
the experimental and control groups, everybody was nursing fine! The
researchers concluded that in the extremely supportive breastfeeding culture
of the area, “early” contact was not a necessary part of normal infant
feeding, although studies done in Western/Northern non-supportive
environments had found that it made a big difference. In other words, it
wasn’t broke, so they didn’t need to fix it!
Chris Mulford
Eastern USA
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|