Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:23:38 EDT |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In einer eMail vom 12-4-02 17:56:30 West-Europa (zomertijd) schreibt
[log in to unmask]:
> If you want to take the Bible as an historically accurate book, the breasts
> were created by God many thousands of years ago with a DUAL purpose: to feed
> offspring (see the many Scriptural references regarding nursing) and to
> represent beauty, femininity, and sexuality (see the Biblical book Song of
> Solomon). Both purposes seem to be valid and pleasurable to women, their
> children, and their mates.
>
I think this will make it a cultural matter to see breasts as sexual.
Christianity is but one of many ways to explain the wonders of life.
Actually, I do not think that the bible is a historical accurate resource.
I think that biological, no one body part is meant to be sexual all the time.
In animals the genitals are only sexual if the animal is in heat. During
other times they function as a identification mark.
Warmly greeting,
Gonneke
==================
Gonneke van Veldhuizen =+= IBCLC, LLLL, MOM =+= primairy school teacher
EUROLAC
breastfeeding information centre and lactation consultant practice
http://www.users.skynet.be/eurolac
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|