Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 13 May 2002 08:52:25 -0400 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 5/13/02 12:00 AM, you wrote:
>Do we go back to Apistan, or is Apistan still useless, or is IPM the only answer?
Statements like this misrepresent the whole principle of IPM.
IPM *does not mean* NO chemicals. IPM is *integrated* pest management.
It *does not mean* use chemicals first, ask questions later.
IPM means: try cultural controls first, like cleanliness, proper management, mechanical controls, etc.
IPM means: evaluate the problem and develop a strategy. Try new things like drone brood trapping.
IPM means: use chemicals if all else fails. Switch chemicals. Stay on top of the news.
pb
|
|
|