Denis Fodor <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>That couldn't be far off the mark. But here's a little additional spin.
>The RC should comprise composers whose oeuvre proved paradigmatic of the
>various phases of the development of CM. A bit of
I think here you strayed a bit too far away from what Mr. Schwartz
intended with his list, which I think was meant to be a sort of "Top 50"
list but nothing more... certainly not a comprehensive survey of all truly
hisorically important CM. Think "radio play" and you'd still leave off
Schoenberg and Webern and all the pre-baroque as Mr. Schwartz did in his
original list.
Albie