Denis Fodor <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >That couldn't be far off the mark. But here's a little additional spin. >The RC should comprise composers whose oeuvre proved paradigmatic of the >various phases of the development of CM. A bit of I think here you strayed a bit too far away from what Mr. Schwartz intended with his list, which I think was meant to be a sort of "Top 50" list but nothing more... certainly not a comprehensive survey of all truly hisorically important CM. Think "radio play" and you'd still leave off Schoenberg and Webern and all the pre-baroque as Mr. Schwartz did in his original list. Albie