Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 11 Jun 2001 22:27:29 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Sandra, so interesting, thank you for simplifying the facts and presenting
the issues so clearly.
you wrote;<< Far less dioxin crosses the placenta than is lactated out
through the breasts because blood has less fat in it than milk on a
per volume basis. So, from the point of view of the mother, her body
burden drops faster during lactation than during pregnancy.>>
so, to lower the dioxin levels in tissues and decrease that first baby's
breastmilk-conveyed dioxin dose, ........pre-pregnancy induced lactation
would be an effective method? time-consuming, difficult, maybe not very much
milk produced for the effort. maybe the liposuction would be easier and
quicker, but not without risk and also expense. just wondering if we could
make a good case for insurance to pay for the liposuction :-)
Debbie Tobin
RN BSN IBCLC LCCE
Springfield, Virginia USA
In the Fairfax County suburbs outside the Washington DC beltway
[log in to unmask]
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|