Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 16 Mar 2001 09:01:04 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I decided to go take a look at "Institute for Child Health" mentioned in
that article. I take it from the quoted passages that this is the one
in England:
> LONDON (Reuters) - Breast is still best for young babies but
> But new research reported on Friday by doctors at the Institute of Child
> Health
> Ian Booth, of the University of Birmingham in England, said the study should
> not alter
I found an institute of child health in the UK at this address:
http://www.ich.bpmf.ac.uk/
I went to "search the site" in the left hand column, and entered in
"sponsors". That brought up a whole bunch of "access denied" pages,
some of which had exerpts available that talked about Wellcome. Given
its spelling, I assumed this was not a general "welcome to the site"
type of word. ;-) I then went back to the search engine and entered in
"Wellcome" and found a whole lot of links to sponsorship from
Glaxo/Wellcome.
Am I mistaken, or do they make some sort of infant food (synthetic type)
that is to "replace" mother's milk? I thought they did, but I may be
wrong...
Maybe I'm barking up the wrong tree here, but it would seem that there
is a large chance that this "4 months is just enough" study is a bit
biased due to the possible source of funding.
Fio.
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|