Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 27 Jun 2001 10:25:47 EDT |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Sorry if this is late on this thread but...
In a message dated 06/26/2001 4:45:35 AM Central Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
<< Montagu quotes from the original researchers (Harlow and Zimmerman,
1958): "These data make it obvious that contact comfort is a variable
of overwhelming importance in the development of affectational
responses, whereas lactation is a variable of negligible importance. >>
I would argue that a cloth-covered fake monkey with a bottle of milk
attached is not lactating any more than a human father holding a bottle. I
wonder if there was even real monkey milk in the bottle. Point is, I think
this research shows that nurturting touch will outstrip hunger except when
absolutely necessary. But I wouldn't say it shows that lactation is of
negligible importance. This is not mothering through breastfeeding as normal
primates live it.
Judy LeVan Fram, Brooklyn., NY
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|