Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 14 Feb 2001 11:55:49 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jennifer: I agree about your statement regarding the deleterious effects of
cow milk. Just because I posted negatively about soy does NOT mean I'm
endorsing cow. In fact, I and my family do not ingest any milk. As I
posted earlier, I have NEVER had cow milk (was dx as highly allergic as a
baby and given soy of all things--not breastmilk bec by father thought it
"inappropriate"). Anyway, the whole "Got Milk?" campaign is one of the most
"successful" cases of social marketing. I teach my students, patients and
family that milk is not necessary beyond natural weaning (3+ years in the
case of my own kids), and in fact, it can have negative health effects. For
those who question this, there is a growing body of evidence that supports
this (some of the earliest works are from Dr. Frank Oski--a previous
Mothering Magazine "living treasure" I believe). Those of us who do not
drink milk, but do get our calcium in other ways and engage in active weight
bearing exercises--have exceptionally strong bones as documented by bone
scans. Sorry to all the dairy farmers out there, but my choice is clear
(water, that is).
--Chris Hafner-Eaton, PhD, MPH, CHES, IBCLC [log in to unmask]
€€€INFANT CUISINE AND MOTHER CARE: LACTATION CONSULTING & PERINATAL CARE€€€
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|