Oops! I just mostly wanted to make sure no one would read it wrong and
worse yet vote incorrectly. It is misleading. I personally had to read it 3
times to make sure I was voting accurately. So, you can see why I would
think that some one else had read it incorrectly when I looked at it and the
statistics were reversed. Chris
>.This is a good example of how the
wording of a question can skew the results. If we, the experts.
read it wrong, how many lay people read it correctly?
> At 04:16 PM 12/30/00 EST, you wrote:
> >I think that a previous poster read the vote incorrectly. Below is the
> >question and the respones. It looks like 75% DO NOT believe it is wrong
> to
> >nurse an child older than 2. Chris BEtzold NP
>
> When Anne Grider sent her post to Lactnet about the poll it *was* 75%
> voting that it was wrong to be nursing a child past 2 years. Within a few
> hours of her posting the numbers began to change and by yesterday evening
> it had reversed.
>
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html