LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jennifer Tow <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 11 Nov 2000 17:40:57 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
In a message dated 11/11/0 5:49:47 AM, [log in to unmask] writes:

<<  Jennifer,  this is the REAL problem.  LCs should not be viewed as
"adjuncts" to the real NURSING profession.  Many IBCLCs have no nursing
degrees, but still perform LC work, perhaps even more effectively than some
nurses.  When will a lactation consultant credential be viewed on it's own
merits? A number of the first IBCLCs credentialed in 1985 were NOT nurses.
If an LC is an adjunct to the real nursing profession-- where does that leave
non-RN LCs?   I believe that an LC should stand on it's OWN-- just like
speech pathology, OT or RN. >>

Debbie,
I think I was making the same point. What I was attempting to clarify was how
things are, not how they should be. Obviously, as a non-RN, I believe this is
a whole profession unto itself.
Jennifer Tow, IBCLC, CT, USA

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2