Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 5 Dec 2000 09:17:30 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I understand the need to feed the baby but I really don't see why it has to
be with a bottle. K.Boggs states we "live in dire fear of nipple confusion
when it is not really necessary." Having lived thru nipple confusion with
my first which ultimately ended in an early & traumatic weaning, I do have
very real fears of nipple confusion. Sure, there were other factors,
traumatic birth, for one, lack of knowledge on my part & on the part of my
medical caregivers, and so on. but my baby didn't regain his birth weight
'til 6 weeks, & supplementation by bottle did not help my milk supply. a
pacifier was used also. my baby would come to the breast & scream
frantically & refuse to latch.it was heartbreaking. i sobbed when i finally
gave up & fed him his first bottle from me (my husband had previously given
the supplements). as someone has said, i don't know who, it is a slippery
slope & in my humble but based-on-having-been-there opinion, a bottle is
best avoided. even now, 14 years later, writing this, i get choked up.a
rubber nipple can have long-lasting effects.
deborah sowery-quinn
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|