Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 17 May 2000 10:13:32 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I was delighted to see Catherine Fetherston's succinct discussion of
incidence of mastitis in her prospective studies, and her comments on the
threads resulting from the journal club issue. I can remember having a
discussion some years ago with Ed Newton about the incidence of mastitis.
The medical lit. really states an incidence around 3%, but I just did not
see how that could be true given the number of cases I'd seen (and continue
to see) in priv. practice. Of course, priv. practice is self-selected for
problems, but even so, there was no way 3% could have been correct. So
bravo for all those engaged in descriptive research. There is more we don't
know, and room for so much exciting discovery.
Barbara Wilson-Clay, BSEd, IBCLC
Austin Lactation Associates, Austin, Texas
http://www.lactnews.com
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|