Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 13 Jun 2000 09:22:17 EDT |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jennifer wrote that,
<< My dd was only 3 1/2 when I completely lost
my milk supply due to a miscarriage and subsequent hemorrhage. She continued
to nurse "dry" for the next 1 1/2 years. I am convinced she would have sucked
her thumb if I had weaned her so early as she clearly needed to suckle. >>
But Jennifer, the disagreement here between David Page and Barbara
Wilson-Clay was about the reasons that some NEONATES are initially attracted
to pacifier use, while others are not interested. Barbara suggested that
compromised respiration increases the likelihood that a baby will be a paci
sucker; David thinks no, it's basically all parent driven. Seems like what
our 3.5 - 5 year old children need is a whole different ball of wax from this
-- fertile, interesting, and so far both candid and polite -- discussion.
Elisheva Urbas, NYC
reading and learning
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|