Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 27 Mar 2000 13:22:44 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 3/27/00 10:59:41 AM, [log in to unmask] writes:
<< >If a mother is never informed of the true risks, she can never make an
>informed decision, and grave health consequences may occur for her infant.
I agree, especially since from what I have seen in my breastfeeding classes,
and at LLL meetings, many of the risks of formula are not widely known.
There is (at least around here) a general knowledge among the public that
breastfeeding is healthier and provides immunity. These are the most
commonly mentioned advantages of breastfeeding by mothers and mothers to
be.>> <snip>
I don't see where guilt has any place when we're
talking about research based facts.>>
I agree completely. When we say something has benefits, we are making a very
weak statement. When we say something has hazards, we are making a strong
statement. When we say breastmilk is superior or ideal, so what? Who lives an
ideal life, who is perfect and eats a perfect diet? But when we say that
something is dangerous, people naturally move away from that danger. It is
human nature to move away from pain, *before* moving towards pleasure. Just
my 10cc.
Jennifer Tow, IBCLC, CT, USA
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|